312-300-2028
Introduction
In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has expanded the reach of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) to include economic harms resulting from personal injuries. This ruling could reshape the landscape for product liability and consumer protection cases.
Case Overview
The case, Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn, centered on a commercial truck driver who was fired after testing positive for THC. He claimed the positive result was due to a mislabeled CBD product that was marketed as THC-free. The resulting job loss and economic impact triggered his civil RICO claim.
The Court’s Decision
The Court held that economic losses—such as lost wages—linked to personal injuries can constitute actionable harm under civil RICO. This marks a significant expansion of what plaintiffs can allege under the statute, especially in cases involving product mislabeling and fraud.
Implications
This decision may lead to a rise in RICO-based litigation in the personal injury context, particularly against manufacturers in the cannabis and supplement industries. Plaintiffs may now have an additional avenue for damages when misrepresentation leads to significant financial consequences.
Conclusion
Plaintiffs’ attorneys should take note: civil RICO claims may now supplement traditional tort claims, opening the door for creative legal strategies in cases involving economic fallout from mislabeled or defective products.
